How has evaluating these sources this way affected what you know about this issue? Have your own personal views on the issue change? If so, in what way? If not, why not? If so, has your opinion about that changed?Ĭlearly, one of the main issues presented in NAME the fallacy and explain why you think that fallacy was employed. Now that you've done all of this research apply critical thinking strategies to all the arguments presented in all the articles you have used. Paraphrase and summarize the main points. You are giving each side of this issue a fair shake. This must be in third person, written with an eye toward objectivity. In this section you will present the main points of each of your sources. The perspectives: 500-750 words per side (1000-1500 words total) However, if you just wanted to focus on Fortnite, you could. However, if you wanted to write about a type of app like a dating app or a gaming app, that is OK because your focus would be on the good and bad of that kind of app. Write about Twitter or Facebook or Tik Tok NOT all three because the do different things and have different rules. If you want to discuss social media, pick a particular kind. That means you may write this section in first person. This is where you simply explain the topic chosen and WHY you chose it. Review the the Purdue Owl's page on what constitutes a good paragraph (Links to an external site.). NO DIRECT QUOTES! Paraphrase, summarize and cite your work.Ħ. APA formatting is explained in graphic detail there.ĥ. You are held accountable for the information presented there. Review the Everything you wanted to know about citing tab in the vital information module BEFORE submitting this paper. You may use one unique source for the introduction if you feel it is absolutely necessary to explain the issue.Ĥ. If you feel you need a third source for one side of the issue, you must then find another or the other side. You must have a minimum of TWO sources per side of the issue for a total of FOUR sources. Think of it this way a book about women's suffrage written in 1921, one year after it happened is going to have a lot less information and context than a book written in 2021, 101 years afterward as there will be more data, anecdotes and context.ģ. Even if you are using a source that gives some history of your topic, you still need to find one that is current. All the sources must be dated either 2021 or 2022. Think big headline issues, not something local that has limited coverage.Ģ. Pick something that has a lot of coverage. It is OK if you determine neither side is valid.ġ. Of course, it is logically false to say "All blanks are blank" and so, for this paper, you are going to be tasked at looking at multiple sides of one aspect of technology, be it hardware or software, presenting all sides as "fact" and then doing a deep analysis, using what we learned about logical fallacies to determine what is valid. Clearly, the book shows us some of the down sides of technology. Clearly, one of the main issues presented in Decelerate Blue is technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |